Cases 61 - 70 of 940
Laber v. Austin
as 23-3157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STAN LABER
Defendant / Appellee:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, Secretary, United States Department of Defense
Mengert v. United States
as 23-5100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA MENGERT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hackford v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Richita Marie Hackford
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. American Bank of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
American Bank of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Perez v. United States Attorney General
as 1:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Matias Perez
Defendant:
United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Cuara R. v. IRS et al
as 2:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
IRS, United States Social Security, NAPA Auto Parts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuara R. v. Vanguard Group et al
as 2:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Vanguard Group, DigiCert, Clearlake Capital Group and TA Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuara R. v. Pentagon et al
as 2:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Constantino R. Cuara and Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Pentagon, United States Army, United States Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstead v. United States
as 1:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
Brenda C. Armstead
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeWilde v. United States Attorney General, et al
as 23-8054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAKE STANLEY DEWILDE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
