Cases 61 - 70 of 939
Armstead v. United States
as 1:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
Brenda C. Armstead
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Farden v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
Charles Farden
Defendant:
United States and Johnathan J Vigil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cuara R. v. North Point Industrial et al
as 2:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
North Point Industrial, Iom Freeman, Travis Healey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuara R. v. IRS et al
as 2:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
IRS, United States Social Security, NAPA Auto Parts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuara R. v. Pentagon et al
as 2:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Constantino R. Cuara and Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Pentagon, United States Army, United States Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuara R. v. Vanguard Group et al
as 2:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Vanguard Group, DigiCert, Clearlake Capital Group and TA Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. United States Post Office
as 23-1239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
DeWilde v. United States Attorney General, et al
as 23-8054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAKE STANLEY DEWILDE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES
Hackford v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Richita Marie Hackford
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
