Cases 71 - 80 of 938
Hughes v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Tarrell Hughes
Defendant:
Megan Smith, Andy LNU, US Marshalls Agent # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Finley et al v. Sublette County Circuit Court Judge et al
as 1:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Finley Jamison-Daniel, Jamison D Vanderhagen and Jamison Daniel Finley
Defendant:
Sublette County Circuit Court Judge, Detective Terrel, United States Drug Enforcement Agency Detective and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Edwards v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2023cv02306
Plaintiff:
Steven Eugene Edwards
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Link v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2023cv01703
Plaintiff:
Darrell A Link
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, United States Executive Office of the President and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
United States v. Deberry
as 23-1207
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FREDERICK D. DEBERRY
Lopez v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ernest Lopez
Defendant:
United States of America and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
