Cases 71 - 80 of 107
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00145
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gonzales v. Goret et al
as 6:2010cv00989
Plaintiff:
Gloria Gonzales
Defendant:
Clay Goret and Josh Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633
Burr v. Tame et al
as 2:2009cv00970
Defendant:
Jaren Tame, Brent Dietrich, FNU Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Burr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Glaser v. City and County of Denver
as 09-1339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS A. GLASER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, MITCH MORRISSEY, Denver District Attorney, individually and in his official capacity acting under color of law, JOE MORALES, Deputy District Attorney, individually and in his official capacity acting under color of law and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-3207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mills v. Sedgwick County Kansas et al
as 6:2009cv01192
Plaintiff:
Edward Joe Mills
Defendant:
Sedgwick County Kansas, Sedgwick County Department of Corrections, Judge James V Riddel Boys' Ranch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
