Cases 1 - 10 of 42,302
Winn v. Chapter Living
as 2:2024cv02264
Plaintiff:
Darlene Winn
Defendant:
Chapter Living
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sharp v. URBN US RETAIL, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02265
Plaintiff:
Olufemi Sharp
Defendant:
URBN US RETAIL, LLC, URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC. and ANTHROPOLOGIE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Flatt v. Clardy et al
as 6:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Douglas Leon Flatt
Defendant:
Kevin Clardy, Board of County Commissioners of McCurtain County, Oklahoma and Mike O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaramillo v. Lopez et al
as 1:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Audra Jaramillo
Defendant:
Richard Lopez and Carlos Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander et al v. Lopez et al
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Amanda Alexander and Joseph Remalia
Defendant:
Richard Lopez, Carlos Valenzuela and Larry Reuter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reed v. State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Richard Reed
Defendant:
State of New Mexico and Manny Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Thomsen v. Armfield et al
as 5:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
William C Thomsen
Defendant:
Cory Armfield and Roger Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Archuleta
as 1:2024cv01685
Plaintiff:
Mr. Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Deputy Joseph Archuleta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
