Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Kyte, et al v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1319
Defendant:
DENVER HEALTH, STATE OF OREGON and STATE OF COLORADO
Plaintiff:
MEGAN KYTE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kyte (PS) v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01944
Defendant:
State of Colorado, State of Oregon and Denver Health
Plaintiff:
Megan Kyte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nieto v. B. et al
as 1:2024cv00510
Defendant:
Jerrallyn B., Robert Montoya, Sr, Sherrie B. and others
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ann Nieto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Ellison
as 1:2024cv01352
Defendant:
Samantha Ellison
Plaintiff:
Megan Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (d)(p) - Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Lucius et al v Naphcare Inc.
as 1:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Estate of Alizon Lopez and SHAWN LUCIUS
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONES OF COUNTY OF MESA, COLORADO, Todd Rowell, Craig Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Johnson et al v. Uintah School District et al
as 2:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Jason Johnson, Aubri Johnson, T.J. Johnson and others
Defendant:
Uintah School District, Utah State Board of Education, Sydnee Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dees (PS) et al v. Hood et al
as 1:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Dees and Ethan D. Smith
Defendant:
William Hood, Alexis King, Christopher Zenisek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lowrey v. Collela et al
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Lowrey
Defendant:
Nancy Collela, Cheryl H Johnson, James Noel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leasher v. Massey
as 6:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lee Leasher
Defendant:
Megan E. Massey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
