Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Drum v. Milan Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Amy Drum
Defendant:
Milan Police Department, Tony Mace, Michael Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Muhammad v. Regents of the University of Colorado
as 1:2023cv01712
Plaintiff:
Al-Nisa Malikah Muhammad
Defendant:
Regents of the University of Colorado a body corporate doing business as University of Colorado Hospital
Garcia v. City of Carlsbad Board Members et al
as 2:2022cv00668
Plaintiff:
Jesus M Garcia
Defendant:
City of Carlsbad Board Members et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, State County City Officials, et al., Tulsa County Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Al Ghareeb v. Board of Trustees at the University of Northern Colorado
as 1:2022cv01188
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Al Ghareeb
Defendant:
Board of Trustees at the University of Northern Colorado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kemp v. Mauldin Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
Bobby Kemp and Bobby M. Kemp
Defendant:
Mauldin Corporation et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Gender)
Burke v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 22-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE D. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, G.T. BYNUM, Mayor of City of Tulsa, MARK SWINNEY, City of Tulsa Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
