Civil Rights Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Champion v. McCalister, et al
as 23-6141
Plaintiff / Appellant: CAITANYA A. CHAMPION
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICER GREG MCCALISTER, WADE GOURLEY, Police Chief, Oklahoma City Police Department and OKLAHOMA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Muthle (PS) v. Modera River North
as 1:2023cv01686
Plaintiff: Champion Muthle
Defendant: Modera River North
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01090
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Muthle v. Hostel Fish, LLC
as 1:2023cv01088
Plaintiff: Champion D. Muthle
Defendant: Hostel Fish, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Champion v. Hodges et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00974
Plaintiff: Caitanya A Champion
Defendant: FNU Hodges, Wade Gourley, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Champion v. Jordan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00012
Plaintiff: Caitanya A Champion
Defendant: Kenneth Jordan, Wade Gourley, Oklahoma City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00442
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00040
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3207
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3208
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?