Cases 1 - 10 of 217
T. et al v. Board of Education of the Pecos Independent School District et al
as 1:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
D. T.
Defendant:
Board of Education of the Pecos Independent School District, Joshua Gregory Rico and Fred Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fred v. City of Greeley
as 1:2023cv03309
Plaintiff:
Joyce Fred
Defendant:
City of Greeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Roman v. Miller et al
as 6:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roman
Defendant:
Jeffery Miller, Fred Corley, Katie Bray Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Weimer v. Smith, et al
as 23-6115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD WEIMER
Defendant / Appellee:
FRED COLSON SMITH, JR., CHARLES WHITTINGTON, INAS YACOUB and others
Leon (PS) v. Schulz et al
as 1:2023cv01883
Plaintiff:
Raymundo Leon
Defendant:
Stephen Schulz, Joshua Atwell, Anne Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dimas v. Pecos Independent School District Board, et al
as 23-2064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DE ANZA ANGEL DIMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
PECOS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, PECOS HIGH SCHOOL, MICHAEL FLORES, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Weimer v. Smith et al
as 5:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Weimer
Defendant:
Fred Colson Smith, Charles Whittington, Inas Yacoub and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
