Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6080
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
VanBuskirk, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6079
Plaintiff:
AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6078
Plaintiff:
MELISSA GUNTER, AUSTIN GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Vanbuskirk v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6070
Plaintiff:
AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6069
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6049
Plaintiff:
MELISSA GUNTER, AUSTIN GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
AKG v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
AKG, Austin Gunter, Aaron Vanbuskirk and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, John Canavan, Tracy McDaniel and others
Topkov v. Grubb et al
as 5:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alexander Topkov
Defendant:
Allan Grubb, John Doe, Lincoln County Board of County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young et al v. Grubbs
as 1:2021cv02926
Plaintiff:
Mark Young and Anna Dulaney
Defendant:
Angela Grubbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swan v. Hugoton, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2018cv02483
Defendant:
Hugoton, Kansas, City of, Josh Grubbs and Wayne Tate
Plaintiff:
Dana Swan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
