Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination
Dennis v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
Suzy Dennis
Defendant:
Anthony Brown, Geoffrey Vogel, Nathaniel Nedig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamilton v. Luehrs et al
as 1:2021cv01265
Plaintiff:
John P. Hamilton
Defendant:
Lukcas Saliva, St. Francis Center, The and Thomas Luehrs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epps et al v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2020cv01878
Plaintiff:
Amanda Blasingame, Apryl Alexander, Ashlee Wedgeworth and others
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, David Abeyta, City of Aurora, CO and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Kevin Beasley, Heather R. Jossi, Chelsea Novotny and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Ambrose Cruz, Jacquelyn Parkins, Andy Sannier and others
Interested Party:
Baumgartner Law, LLC and Beem & Isley, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Reyes
as 1:2019cv02605
Plaintiff:
Jan Barton Hamilton
Defendant:
Lisa L. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fields v. Hamilton
as 1:2016cv02341
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Dawn Fields
Defendant:
James Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 1:2015cv01660
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Department of Court Records, Allegheny County, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv01141
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
