Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. Montgomery City of et al
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery City of and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Linda Gray
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Michael Boger, Kristine Kusner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKaufman v. Child Support Services et al
as 5:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Deonte Martize McKaufman
Defendant:
Child Support Services, Amazon, Department of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
TaVion Murphy
Defendant:
Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, Dominique Thomas and Board Of County Commissioners for Oklahoma County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Truong et al v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Mac Truong, NARAL Pro-Choice America, Kevin McCarthy and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Greg McCortney, Charles McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00408
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
