Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Harris v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dewayne Harris
Defendant:
Mike Reed, Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC, John Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawton (PS) v. Turner et al
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Reed Lawton
Defendant:
John Turner, Billy A Salazar and Daniel Walzl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Kevin Dizmang v. Reed et al
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Estate of Kevin Dizmang
Defendant:
Sean Reed and Nick Fisher
Viegas et al v. Owens et al
as 1:2023cv02939
Defendant:
NewRez LLC, Reed W. Owens, Chris Kilkenny and others
Plaintiff:
Keri Lynn Viegas and James Viegas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fowler, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 23-5080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROWAN FOWLER, ALLISTER HALL and CARTER RAY
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Oklahoma, KEITH REED, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Health for the Oklahoma State Department of Health and KELLY BAKER, in her official capacity as State Registrar of Vital Records
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Reed v. Ranlife Home Loans et al
as 2:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Michelle Reed
Defendant:
Ranlife Home Loans and Ranlife
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
