Civil Rights Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00097
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sorensen v. Hatt et al
as 2:2021cv00404
Defendant: David Hatt, Joan Hatt, Jill Savage and others
Plaintiff: Austyn Sorensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
White v. Ternes et al
as 1:2016cv02922
Plaintiff: Mark White and Tanya White
Defendant: Cheryl (I) Ternes , Cheryl Ternes , Lynn (I) Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Senecal v. Kanab City et al
as 2:2015cv00771
Plaintiff: Robert Alan Senecal
Defendant: Kanab City, Nina Laycook, James G. Sorensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peay, et al v. Murphy, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-4198
Plaintiff - Appellee: MIKE PEAY, COLLEEN PEAY, MATTHEW PEAY and others
Defendant - Appellant: JOANN MURPHY, WADE BERRY, ROB RIDING and others
Todd v. Bigelow et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00808
Plaintiff: Shayne E. Todd
Defendant: Alfred Bigelow, Alfred Bigelow, FNU Sorensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type: Civil Rights None
Burke v. Woodside et al
as 2:2008cv00069
Plaintiff: John Burke
Defendant: Nancy Woodside, Harvey E. Worley, George W. Bench and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyett, et al v. Washington County, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-4315
Plaintiff - Appellant: SANDRA BOYETT, individually and as personal representative for the estate of Raymond Boyett, JESSICA (BOYETT) PETERSON and BRANDY (BOYETT) SORENSEN
Defendant - Appellee: WASHINGTON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, WASHINGTON COUNTY PURGATORY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, a political subdivision of the the State of Utah, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?