Cases 131 - 140 of 180
Starr v. Officer Kober, et al
as 14-6074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL PAUL STARR
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER KOBER, correctional officer, SERGEANT BASHEAR, SERGEANT HAUNG, grievance officer and others
Ruppert v. NM Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 14-2030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES KEVIN RUPPERT
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Reza-Gomez v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00029
Plaintiff:
Oscar Reza-Gomez
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Corizon, Geo Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villasenor v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03493
Plaintiff:
Domingo Villasenor
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Sanchez and U.S. Marshalls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2013cv01013
Plaintiff:
Eric J Ford
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, H A Rios, Jr and Robert Pine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00971
Plaintiff:
David Bardell Williams
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Cox and Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. The GEO Group, et al
as 13-2146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GEO GROUP, INC., N.M. CORRS. DEP'T, ISSAC GUERRA and others
Beyene v. GEO Group Inc.,
as 1:2013cv02110
Plaintiff:
Zelalem Beyene
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. GEO Group Inc
as 5:2013cv00767
Plaintiff:
Eric J Ford
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fawley v. GEO Group, Inc., et al
as 13-2085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN WILLIAM FAWLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INC., GREGG MARCANTEL, in his official capacity as Secretary for the New Mexico Department of Corrections, DWAYNE BURRIS, Correctional Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
