Cases 171 - 180 of 248
Gordon v. Medina, et al
as 11-1471
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY GORDON
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden at Limon Correctional Facility and JOHN SUTHERS, actually named as the Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Ontiveros-Perez v. Medina et al
as 1:2011cv02598
Petitioner:
Julio Ontiveros-Perez
Respondent:
Angel Medina and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Medina v. LNU et al
as 1:2011cv00864
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Medina
Respondent:
FNU LNU and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Medina et al
as 1:2011cv02470
Petitioner:
Keith C. Brooks, Jr.
Respondent:
Angel Medina and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Escobar v. Olivett, et al
as 11-1422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MEDINA ESCOBAR
Defendant:
L. REID, K. COOPER, E. CELLA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
E. MORA, R. OLIVETT, C/O WOLLFOLK and others
Roebuck v. Medina, et al
as 11-1399
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCELLOUS ANDER ROEBUCK
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA and JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Velasquez-Medina v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00738
Petitioner:
Luis Velasquez-Medina
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Elizabeth N. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Medina
as 11-1328
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden, Limon Corr Facility
Jesus et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00591
Plaintiff:
Anguiano Jesus, Rudy Martinez and Oscar Munez-Medina
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Cibola Correctional Center, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Medina, et al
as 11-1290
Petitioner - Appellant:
ZACHARY C. RHODES
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
