Cases 11 - 20 of 285
Chavez v. USA
as 2:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Eduardo Chavez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Curry County Detention Center
as 2:2023cv00866
Plaintiff:
John Michael Chavez
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02358
Plaintiff:
Michael Lopez
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Larry Cox, John Palomino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaro v. Corizon Health, et al
as 23-2117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO J. "PETE" AMARO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., WEXFORD HEALTH, INC., UNKNOWN DENTIST #1 and others
Kelley v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Kelley, George Isbill, Rocky Ward and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eaves (PS) v. Kory et al
as 1:2023cv01627
Plaintiff:
Rodney Eaves and Rodney Douglas Eaves
Defendant:
Kory, Jerry Roark, Danny Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Board of County Commissioners et al
as 1:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Charlie A. Chavez
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners, Metropolitan Detention Center, Jason Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez-Chavez v. USA
as 5:2023cv00591
Petitioner:
Esteban Angel Vasquez-Chavez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
