Cases 11 - 20 of 269
Antonetti v. FNU Santistefan, et al
as 24-2014
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant:
FNU SANTISTEFAN, FNU MARTINEZ, Warden, FNU BROWN, Warden and others
Trotter v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jared M Trotter
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plater v. Topping, et al
as 23-6217
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM LA'MONZE PLATER
Defendant:
CHRISTINE TOPPING, (FNU) ROWLEY, GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Poindexter v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Jim Poindexter
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Timms FNU and Nurse Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albright v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00976
Plaintiff:
Joshua Roy Albright
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc and FNU Timms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Bryce Franklin
Defendant:
D. Jackson, Mathew Montoya, Timothy Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plater v. Poirot, et al
as 23-6131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAHEEM LA'MONZE PLATER
Defendant / Appellee:
EDEN POIROT and GEO GROUP, INC.
Baker v. GEO Lawton Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
Xavier Montrell Baker
Defendant:
GEO Lawton Correctional Facility and FNU Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ezell v. Cole, et al
as 23-6110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID COLE, Warden GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU RUSSELL, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual and official capacity, FNU ROGERS, L/T, Mr., S.T.G. GEO, L.C.F., individual capacity and others
Hickey v. GEO Lawton Correctional Rehabilitation Facility et al
as 5:2023cv00733
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Lemont Hickey
Defendant:
GEO Lawton Correctional Rehabilitation Facility, Comanche County Commissioners, Bonnie Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
