Cases 11 - 20 of 258
Wilson v. Christopher et al
as 2:2024cv00003
Defendant:
Debra Kim Christopher, Jessica Cole-Hodgkinson, Lyn Platt Fricker and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Arthur Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeAtley v. Fairbairn, et al
as 23-1406
Petitioner:
ALAN DEATLEY, Tribal member, Tribal Sp. Counsel, Tribal Judge
Respondent:
WARDEN FAIRBAIRN, (A.V.C.F.), DIRECTOR WILLIAMS, (CDOC), GOV. POLIS and others
Luginbyhl v. Moore et al
as 5:2023cv00939
Defendant:
Cimarron Correctional Facility, Darrell L Moore, Judge Phillip C Corley and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Luginbyhl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2023cv02464
Petitioner:
Kerry Thomas
Respondent:
No Named Respondent and United States Magistrate Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDonald (PS) v. 10th Circuit Judges et al
as 1:2023cv02333
Plaintiff:
Nicholas McDonald
Defendant:
10th Circuit Judges and 10th Circuit Magistrates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale-El v. Thornton Police Department, et al
as 23-1269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLBY JEROME HALE-EL
Defendant / Appellee:
THORTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, I. BARLOTT, Officer, ADAMS COUNTY JAIL and others
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Blanchard v. Garfield County Courthouse et al
as 4:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
James Robert Blanchard
Defendant:
Garfield County Courthouse, Kartina Matousek Ames, Judge Hladik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd v. Judge of Case
as 1:2023cv01633
Plaintiff:
Marrin T Boyd, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge of Case
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Templeton, et al
as 23-1203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS JOHN MCDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
LAKEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN TEMPLETON and JUDGE VANGILDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
