Cases 11 - 20 of 278
Heurtevant v. People of the State of Colorado
as 1:2023cv01447
Plaintiff:
Darren Heurtevant
Defendant:
People of the State of Colorado and King Soopers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Ciolli
as 23-1201
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC KING
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden, Florence FCC and ADX, United States Bureau of Prisons
Heurtevant v. King Soopers
as 1:2023cv01449
Plaintiff:
Darren Heurtevant
Defendant:
King Soopers and Denver County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amman Reu-El (ID 55931) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03139
Plaintiff:
King Phillip Amman Reu-El and Phillip Delbert Cheatham, Jr.
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neill v. Neill et al
as 5:2023cv03137
Plaintiff:
Chase Neill
Defendant:
Pamela Neill, Richard Smith, Tamara Hogsett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armajo v. Wyoming Public Defenders Office et al
as 1:2023cv00065
Defendant:
Corthell and King PC, Wyoming Public Defender, Wyoming Public Defender Trial Counsel and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Alfred Armajo, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maier v. Cartelven et al
as 5:2023cv03114
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coty Maier
Defendant:
Cartelven, Academi, Ashley Nicollete Frangipane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chamberlain v. King
as 1:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peter Laurence Chamberlain
Defendant:
Alexis King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Harpe
as 23-5041
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT EUGENE KING
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN HARPE, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
King v. United States District Court
as 5:2023cv00262
Petitioner:
Clayton Orville King
Respondent:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
