Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Ordonez v. Sorensen et al
as 2:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Mario Ordonez
Defendant:
Dennis Sorensen, John Irons, Mel Coulter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bomprezzi v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2014cv02753
Petitioner:
Mel Bomprezzi
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leishman v. Patterson, et al
as 14-4076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP M. LEISHMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM PATTERSON, Executive Director of the UDOC, MIKE HADDON, Deputy Director of the UDOC, LOWELL CLARK, Director of Institutional Operations for UDOC and others
Bomprezzi v. Ohanian
as 14-1123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEL BOMPREZZI
Defendant - Appellee:
ARA OHANIAN
Bomprezzi v. Ohanian
as 1:2014cv00199
Plaintiff:
Mel Bomprezzi
Defendant:
Ara Ohanian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bomprezzi v. Hoffman et al
as 1:2013cv02085
Plaintiff:
Mel Bomprezzi
Defendant:
Graham Hoffman, Alexander, Julie Meeker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bomprezzi v. Caschette, et al
as 13-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEL BOMPREZZI
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD CASCHETTE, Judge, JASON SIERS, Public Defender, KATHLEEN MCGUIRE, Public Defender and others
Fleming v. Coulter, et al
as 12-4184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL STANLEY FLEMING
Defendant - Appellee:
MEL COULTER, Captain, Central Utah Correctional Facility, DARWIN JOHNSON, Corrections Officer, Central Utah Correctional Facility, TROY KENNEDY, Corrections Officer, Central Utah Correctional Officer and others
Thompson v. Coulter
as 2:2012cv00680
Plaintiff:
Wesley Thompson
Defendant:
Mel Coulter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 12-6109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
