Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Hodson v. Fisher, et al
as 15-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS HODSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BIRGIT M. FISHER, KAIRI VAHER, Nurse Practioner, JENNIFER, (Last Name Unknow) RN, Register Nurse and others
Nez, Jr. v. Four Unknown Officers, USP Florence
as 1:2015cv00329
Plaintiff:
Calvin J. Nez, Jr.
Defendant:
Four Unknown Officers, USP Florence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pohlmann v. Larimer County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2014cv03466
Plaintiff:
Justin K. Pohlmann
Defendant:
Larimer County Sheriff's Office, Jacki Hurley, S.W.A.T. Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson (ID 100464) v. Hoepner et al
as 5:2014cv03183
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Ray Jackson
Defendant:
Jeremy Hoepner, Dustin Sharp, Melissa Leon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spry v. McKune, et al
as 12-3037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE RAYMOND SPRY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility; UNKNOWN OFFICERS; Disciplinary Administrator, Lansing Correctional Facility, RAY ROBERTS, Secretary of Corrections, (FNU) JEWELL, Unit Team Manager, Lansing Correctional Facility and others
Spry v. McKune et al
as 5:2011cv03057
Plaintiff:
George Raymond Spry
Defendant:
David R. McKune and Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillon v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-1425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INGMAR GILLON
Defendant - Appellee:
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN BLAKE DAVIS, US PENITENTIARY FLORENCE COLORADO and others
Cole v. Pugh, et al
as 08-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY ANTHONY COLE
Defendant - Appellee:
M. PUGH, Warden, C.E.O., R. HOOD, Warden, C.E.O., R. WILEY, Warden, C.E.O. and others
Adams v. Terrell et al
as 5:2007cv03081
Petitioner:
Robert Clarence Adams
Respondent:
Duke Terrell, (fnu) Booth, (fnu) Simic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
