Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Winter (ID 56375) v. Mansfield et al
as 5:2019cv03236
Defendant:
Austin Dunn, Patrick Mansfield, Corizon, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Winter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abram v. Com Cor Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02171
Defendant:
El Paso County Jail, Criminal Justice Center, Janet King, Donna and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Lavonne Lee Abram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abram v. ComCor Inc et al
as 1:2019cv01802
Defendant:
ComCor Inc, Trinity Food Services, Peter Lichtman and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Abram and Howard Lavonne Lee Abram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs v. Ysasi et al
as 1:2018cv02164
Defendant:
Lisa Pec, Winters, Ysasi and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2018cv01331
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Mary M. Mitchell, Sara Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs v. Schooley et al
as 1:2018cv00933
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr.
Defendant:
Schooley, Harmon, Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Winter et al
as 5:2017cv03099
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Richard Winter, Kelee Dell, Christopher Synsvoll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kessler v. Hoak et al
as 1:2014cv03320
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kessler
Defendant:
Mary Hoak, Ashley Shelton and Doug Winters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. Laird, et al
as 13-3265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL LAIRD, Regional Director, AMBER NELSON, Senior Deputy Regional Director, GORDON HARPE, Regional Correctional Services Administrator and others
Pinson, et al v. Laird, et al
as 13-3176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE and ANTOINE BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL LAIRD, Regional Director, AMBER NELSON, GORDON HARPE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
