Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Kones v. No Named Respondents
as 1:2015cv01769
Petitioner:
Earnest Kones
Respondent:
No Named Respondents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warner, et al v. Gross, et al
as 14-6244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES F. WARNER, BENJAMIN R. COLE, by and through his next friend Robert S. Jackson, JOHN M. GRANT and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. CODDINGTON, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ, NICHOLAS A. DAVIS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN J. GROSS, MICHAEL W. ROACH, STEVE BURRAGE and others
Defendant:
H-UNIT SECTION CHIEF X and JOHN DOE EXECUTIONERS #1-10
Movant:
ZIVA BRANSTETTER
Warner et al v. Gross et al
as 5:2014cv00665
Plaintiff:
Charles F Warner , James A Coddington , Benjamin R Cole and others
Defendant:
Kevin J Gross , Michael W Roach , Steve Burrage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Miller
as 13-6252
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT EARNEST MILLER
Johnson v. United States, et al
as 13-1384
Petitioner - Appellant:
EARNEST D'MESCO JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and C. DANIELS, Warden
Johnson v. USA et al
as 1:2013cv01915
Petitioner:
Earnest D'masco Johnson
Respondent:
USA and C. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States v. Miller
as 13-6120
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT EARNEST MILLER
Walker v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2012cv03251
Plaintiff:
Earnest E. Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, James Crawford, John Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vensor v. Clements, et al
as 1:2012cv01974
Respondent:
Tom Clements and Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Petitioner:
Earnest J. Vensor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. United States of America
as 5:2012cv00701
Movant:
Robert Earnest Miller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
