Cases 31 - 40 of 94
Pierce v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00804
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Corizon, LLC, Centurion Correctional Healthcare of New Mexico, LLC ("Centurion"), A Joint Venture Between Centene Corporation and MHM Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Cline
as 5:2018cv03150
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Sam Cline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Cline
as 5:2018cv03012
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Sam Cline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Cline et al
as 5:2017cv03153
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Sam Cline and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chester v. Pratt et al
as 4:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
Toni-Lynn Chester
Defendant:
James Pratt, O Robert Burris, III, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Byrd
as 6:2017cv00213
Petitioner:
Gregory Therman Pierce
Respondent:
Robert Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Huerta v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv00988
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Huerta
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Oliver, Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Montez, et al v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 17-1115
Plaintiff:
JESSE F. MONTEZ, DAVID BRYAN, GEORGE KARL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK GUNTER, Former Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, BEN JOHNSON, Former Warden of Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility, CHERYL SMITH, Medical Administrator at CTCF and others
Claimant - Appellant:
LEWIS ROGER MOORE
Pierce v. McCollum
as 6:2016cv00217
Petitioner:
Carlton R. Pierce
Respondent:
Tracy McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
