Cases 31 - 40 of 116
Swint v. Comic Book Authority et al
as 1:2021cv00382
Defendant:
A M Collins, Lord Baltimore, Oregon Health Authority and others
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint, James Stanley Dean, Chrystal Marie Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowery et al v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03107
Defendant:
Todd Thomason, James Colgan, (fnu) (lnu) and others
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Wallingford, Ramaun Johnson, John E. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Hitchcock et al
as 2:2021cv02141
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Evan Hitchcock, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell (ID 6010477) v. Hitchcock et al
as 5:2021cv03092
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Evan Hitchcock, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor (ID 40516) v. Meyer
as 5:2021cv03088
Petitioner:
Ernest L. Taylor
Respondent:
Shannon Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall (ID 65198) v. Dahler et al
as 5:2021cv03086
Defendant:
Robin Sommer, David Dahler, Shannon Meyer and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Kay Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fountain (ID 115364) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2021cv03041
Defendant:
Katrina Jones, Shannon Meyer, Jacob Ostermeyer and others
Plaintiff:
Jamahal Fountain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claudio v. Meyer et al
as 5:2021cv00092
Defendant:
Dr. FNU Boger, J Kevin Stitt, Jerold Braggs and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anibal Claudio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams (ID 111260) v. Meyer
as 5:2021cv03005
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Shannon Meyer
Petitioner:
Marc Anwar Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sharkey (ID 79005) v. Meyer
as 5:2020cv03322
Petitioner:
Sirpredrick Sharkey
Respondent:
Shannon Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.