Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Jo, et al v. Six Unknown Names Agent
as 13-1515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. SANTOS F., MARIO E. GARCIA C., HANKEY MAURICE, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, or MR. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BARACK OBAMA
Park v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 1:2013cv02547
Plaintiff:
Gems Park
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 1:2013cv02545
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv02264
Petitioner:
Tye J. Smith
Respondent:
John Davis, Colorado State Attorney General, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Judd v. Obama, et al
as 13-1186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, SECRETARY OF STATE OF COLORADO, et al. and DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF COLORADO
Judd v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Keith Judd
Defendant:
State of Utah, Office of the Lieutenant Governor of Utah and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Judd v. Obama et al
as 1:2013cv00559
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Secretary of State of Colorado and Democratic Party of Colorado
Plaintiff:
Keith Judd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 1:2013cv00198
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 13-1019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and MR. BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States
Demos v. US Secretary of Defense et al
as 2:2012cv01209
Plaintiff:
John R. Demos
Defendant:
US Secretary of Defense, David Petraus, Christine Gregoire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
