Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Ingram v. Clements, et al
as 16-1416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY INGRAM
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK CLEMENTS, R. WERHOLZ, RICK RAEMISCH and others
Santistevan v. Pachello
as 15-1423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR SANTISTEVAN, AKA Arthur Santisteven
Defendant - Appellee:
MUNICIPALITY OF THE CITY OF LONE TREE, COLORADO, MUNICIPALITY OF THE CITY OF CASTLE ROCK, COLORADO, TODD PACHELLO, Ex. Detective, Lone Tree Police Department and others
Ippolito v. State of Colorado, et al
as 14-1480
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH C. IPPOLITO
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Division of Adult Parole, JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Governor, RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director (DOC) and others
Crosby v. Nelson, et al
as 14-1115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY D. CROSBY, AKA Gregory Crosby, AKA Gregory D. Cosmo Crosby
Defendant - Appellee:
C. NELSON, Sen. Officer, S. HART, Sen. Officer, J. SHORT, Sen. Officer and others
Seader v. Storey, et al
as 13-1295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON SEADER
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT STOREY, THOMAS JACKSON and AMY RUPPECK, ;JOHN DOE; JANE DOE
Wright v. Doe, et al
as 13-1018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAN WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN AND JANE DOE, Alaska MAC Committee and TAMATHA KAY ANDING, H.S.A.
Baker v. Clements, et al
as 12-1189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY W. BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM CLEMENTS, Dir, DOC, KEVIN MILYARD, Warden, SCF and ALL OTHER JOHN AND JANE DOE MEDICAL STAFF RESPONSABLE [SIC]
Wright v. Does, et al
as 1:2012cv01151
Plaintiff:
Sean Wright
Defendant:
John and Jane Does and Tamatha K. Anding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Burns v. Buford, et al
as 11-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
STACEY BUFORD, JOHN DOE, Colorado Attorney General, R. N. WOLFF and others
Burns v. Buford, et al
as 11-1260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
STACEY BUFORD, JOHN DOE, Colorado Attorney General, R. N. WOLFF and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
