Cases 31 - 40 of 173
Hammons v. Tracy et al
as 1:2016cv00499
Petitioner:
Robert Lester Hammons
Respondent:
Karen Tracy and FNU LNU
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Iverson (ID 6007695) v. Bell et al
as 5:2016cv03102
Plaintiff:
Montee Ray Iverson
Defendant:
(fnu) Bell, Karen Barnt , Misty Keolavone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. Crum
as 1:2016cv00709
Plaintiff:
Gerald Zachary Hammond
Defendant:
Peter Crum, Stob, Carol Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. Stob, et al
as 16-1086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD ZACHARY HAMMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. PETER CRUM, M.D., DR. STOB, CAROL ROGERS, Health Care Admin and others
Harper v. Keith et al
as 4:2016cv00121
Plaintiff:
Duane Harper
Defendant:
Karen Keith, John Doe, Sheriff of Tulsa County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. Stob et al
as 1:2016cv00069
Plaintiff:
Gerald Zachary Hammond
Defendant:
Stob, Carol Rogers, Koonce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Been v. Edwards et al
as 5:2015cv01258
Plaintiff:
Arthur L Been, Jr
Defendant:
Randall R Edwards, Chris West, Adam Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Easter, et al
as 15-3198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY GRIFFIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF EASTER, Sheriff, Sedgwick County Detention Facility and KAREN L. POWELL, Assistant County Counselor
Paulsen v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2015cv00800
Plaintiff:
Mark Walter Paulsen
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Physicians Health Partners, Clinical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seymore v. City and County of Denver Clerk of Court State of Colorado et al
as 1:2015cv00653
Plaintiff:
Christable E. Seymore
Defendant:
City and County of Denver Clerk of Court State of Colorado, Karen McGovern and State for the District of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
