Cases 31 - 40 of 289
Johnson v. Brady, et al
as 22-1448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JILL BRADY, JESSICA AGGSON, DAVID CHAPIN and others
Johnson v. Brady et al
as 1:2022cv03216
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Jill Brady, Jessica Aggson, David Chapin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Goldey et al
as 5:2022cv00921
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Rodriguez
Defendant:
Warden Goldey, Associate Warden Michelli, Captain Bouche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Curry County Detention Center
as 2:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
Chris Rodriguez
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanari v. Polis et al
as 1:2022cv02739
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradley Lanari
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Dean Williams, Jennifer Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rodriguez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
Javier Rodriguez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Veyhle v. Cressman et al
as 1:2022cv02054
Plaintiff:
Gene Neyhle and Gene Veyhle
Defendant:
Mark Cressman, Kevin Flores, Sierra Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lay, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY, by and through his next friend Rhonda Kemp
Plaintiff:
BRENDA E. ANDREW, RONSON KYLE BUSH, JEMAINE MONTEIL CANNON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
