Cases 31 - 40 of 1,217
Clark v. Hill et al
as 5:2023cv03249
Plaintiff:
Richard Leroy Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Tonda Hill, Brett Richman and Wyandotte County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. King et al
as 1:2023cv02989
Plaintiff:
James Hunter
Defendant:
Alexis King, Chris schaffer, Reggie marinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Jenks
as 23-4146
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD JENKS, JR.
McBee (PS) v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2023cv02907
Plaintiff:
Richard McBee and Unique Taylor
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, Stephen Potts, Cynthia Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv02889
Plaintiff:
Richard Meyers
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Wyandotte County Jail
as 5:2023cv03229
Petitioner:
Richard Leroy Clark, Jr.
Respondent:
Daniel Cahill and Wyandotte County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Serna v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2023cv00676
Petitioner:
Antonio Serna
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico and Richard Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crawford v. Lawson et al
as 5:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Bernard Crawford
Defendant:
Regina Lawson, Steven Bickley, T Hastings Siegfried and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hilburn v. Rankins
as 23-7050
Petitioner / Appellant:
RALPH RICHARD HILBURN, II
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM RANKINS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
