Cases 31 - 40 of 2,295
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3004
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Griffin v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv03005
Petitioner:
Nicholas Griffin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whiteman v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00008
Petitioner:
Dalco Gabriel Whiteman
Respondent:
United States and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Srader v. United States, et al
as 24-3001
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS A. SRADER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND, FNU LNU (1) and others
Rowland v. Matevousian, et al
as 23-1411
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ALAN ROWLAND
Defendant:
ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, Regional Director of the North Central Regional Office of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, WILLIAM TRUE, Warden of FCI Florence, SHARI HIMLIE, Health Service Administrator, FCI Florence; JOHN DOES 1-5; JANE DOES 1-5; and others
Hodge v. United States
as 23-8088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHUCK ALLEN HODGE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Poynor v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00233
Petitioner:
Daniel T Poynor
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Florentino v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00514
Petitioner:
Bautista Sanchez Florentino and Florentino Bautista-Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bell v. United States
as 23-5126
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEWAYNE BELL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McKinney v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv03247
Petitioner:
Jason McKinney and Jason McKenney
Respondent:
United States of America and Bruce Tearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
