Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 49,693
Demaris (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv01553
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Demaris
Defendant: Colorado Department of Corrections, Core Civic Prison for Profit, LLC, Core Civic Chairman and President and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Campbell
as 5:2024cv03088
Petitioner: Pierre Quaran Hamilton
Respondent: Nicholas Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walker v. Hudson et al
as 5:2024cv03087
Plaintiff: Derrick S. Walker
Defendant: D. Hudson, (fnu) Walker, (fnu) Sargent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Liles v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00563
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Dylan Michael Liles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hudson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00561
Petitioner: Roy Hudson
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Liu v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00571
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Shaorong Liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner: Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent: William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christensen et al v. Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv00562
Plaintiff: John Christensen and Andrew Linton Sawyers
Defendant: Chris Anderson, Under Sheriff and Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Draine
as 24-6111
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: TIAHMO LENELL DRAINE
United States v. Miller
as 24-7046
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: FLOYD PRESTON MILLER, III

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?