Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Lynn (ID 64377) v. Price et al
as 5:2019cv03125
Defendant:
Sherri Price, John Doe, Romina Gallagher and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McConville v. Willcott
as 5:2019cv03130
Defendant:
P. Willcott and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee McConville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rowe v. Sumner County et al
as 5:2019cv03024
Defendant:
John/Jane Does (1), Sumner County, (fnu) Fairbanks and others
Plaintiff:
Logan Eugene Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neff (ID 63388) v. Winfield Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2019cv03034
Defendant:
(fnu) Fugua, Kansas Department of Corrections, Tyler Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Neff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt (ID 39397) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03284
Defendant:
Jane Doe, M. Bos, A. Fouss and others
Plaintiff:
William R. Holt
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans (ID 68035) v. Schnurr et al
as 5:2018cv03193
Defendant:
John Doe, Douglas W. Burris, Steve Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Zabriel L. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. Revell et al
as 5:2018cv03145
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Sara Revell, (fnu) Inch, Ian Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ridley (ID 117475) v. Sedgwick County Commissioners, Board of et al
as 5:2018cv03097
Plaintiff:
Anthony Earl Ridley
Defendant:
Sedgwick County Commissioners, Board of, Jeff Easter, Sedgwick, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy (ID 76894) v. Burris et al
as 5:2018cv03077
Plaintiff:
DeRon McCoy, Jr.
Defendant:
Douglas Burris, Dan Schnurr, M. A. Nickels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCorkendale (ID 64140) v. Norwood, et al.
as 5:2017cv03225
Plaintiff:
Scott McCorkendale
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, (fnu) Miller, (fnu) Rion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.