Cases 41 - 50 of 406
Quintana v. Wirthlin, et al
as 23-4083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY WIRTHLIN, RAYMOND S. SHUEY, DOMAIN SUMMARY and others
Quintana v. Clark, et al
as 23-4084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
LOGAN CLARK, PA, Utah State Prison Clinical Services Bureau, TODD GAY, PA, Utah State Prison Clinical Services Bureau, MIKE HADDON, Executive Director, Utah State Prison and others
Clark (PS) v. Kartchner et al.
as 1:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Chad Clark
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Jacob Kartchner, Wiard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01534
Petitioner:
Michael Clark
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Spurlock et al
as 1:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Terry R. Clark
Defendant:
Tony G. Spurlock, White, Independent Health Contractor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fawley v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W Fawley
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, John Doe, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Anderson et al
as 1:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Defendant:
James Anderson, Clark Smith, Beth Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintana v. Shewy, et al
as 23-4065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY SHEWY, EDWIN S. WALL, RON FUJINO and others
Quintana v. Wirthlin, et al
as 23-4062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY WIRTHLIN, RAYMOND S. SHUEY, DOMAIN SUMMARY and others
Quintana v. Clark, et al
as 23-4063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
LOGAN CLARK, PA, Utah State Prison Clinical Services Bureau, TODD GAY, PA, Utah State Prison Clinical Services Bureau, MIKE HADDON, Executive Director, Utah State Prison and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
