Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Larson v. Wilson
as 10-8041
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDREW J. LARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDDIE WILSON, State Penitentiary Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections
Larson v. Patterson
as 2:2009cv00989
Petitioner:
Shawn David Larson
Respondent:
Thomas Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beddingfield v. Dunbar et al
as 1:2009cv02452
Plaintiff:
Christopher-Paul Beddingfield
Defendant:
Dunbar, Coleman, McFee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
as 2:2009cv00109
Petitioner:
Andrew J Larson
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Webster et al
as 1:2009cv00961
Plaintiff:
Dana Cooper
Defendant:
Brian Webster, Fortunato, Beverly Dowis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. Wilner
as 1:2009cv00813
Petitioner:
Jack Leslie Larson
Respondent:
J. M. Wilner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Larson-White v. Rohling, et al
as 08-3349
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY STEVEN LARSON-WHITE
Respondent - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility, STATE OF KANSAS and STEVE MCKIEARNAN, Chaplin
Larson-White v. Rohling et al
as 5:2008cv03246
Petitioner:
Anthony Steven Larson-White
Respondent:
Karen S Rohling and State of Kansas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Claice v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2007cv02160
Plaintiff:
John A. Claice
Defendant:
Joe Ortiz, Pryer, Luna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. Chaves County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2007cv00548
Plaintiff:
Shane Larson
Defendant:
Chaves County Board of Commissioners, Chaves County Detention Center, Inc., Chaves County Sherriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
