Cases 41 - 50 of 308
Gilliland v. Barteaux et al
as 4:2022cv00257
Petitioner:
Kimberlie Gilliland
Respondent:
T Luke Barteaux, Sara E Hill and Ralph Keen, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hill (83060) v. Williams
as 5:2022cv03108
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Hill
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yellowbear v. Hill
as 22-8014
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW JOHN YELLOWBEAR, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIDGET HILL, Wyoming Attorney General
Cota v. Copper Hills Youth Center et al
as 2:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Michael Cota
Defendant:
Copper Hills Youth Center, Brett Marshall and David H. Gambles
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yellowbear v. Wyoming Attorney General
as 0:2022cv00057
Defendant:
Wyoming Attorney General and Bridget Hill
Petitioner:
Andrew J Yellowbear, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Nunn
as 22-6042
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD DOUGLAS HILL
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT NUNN
Jordan v. University Hospital et al
as 1:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Jaki N Jordan
Defendant:
University Hospital, Jennifer Stalilonis and Corey Hills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aubertin v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Maurice Aubertin
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc., Anastacio Perez, Michael Moriarity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Nunn
as 5:2021cv01208
Petitioner:
Richard Douglas Hill
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Long et al
as 1:2021cv03203
Petitioner:
Robert Edward Hill
Respondent:
Jeff Long, Dean Williams and Philip J. Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
