Cases 41 - 50 of 116
Woodstock v. Larimer County Sheriff et al
as 1:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jonathan (Lane) Woodstock
Defendant:
Larimer County Sheriff, S. Shaffer, Bret Rickard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pulido v. Payne County Jail et al
as 3:2006cv00852
Plaintiff:
Agustin Pulido
Defendant:
Payne County Jail and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Lane
as 5:2014cv00679
Petitioner:
Jeffery Johnson
Respondent:
Reece Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marks v. Bush, et al
as 14-3129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY DANNY MARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEAN BUSH, Sheriff, Ford County Sheriff's Office, in his individual and official capacity, JAMES LANE, Under Sheriff, Ford County Sheriff's Office, in his individual and official capacity, CHRIS WEIS, Captain, Ford County Detention Center, in his individual and official capacity and others
Nichols v. Wyandotte County Jail et al
as 5:2014cv03083
Plaintiff:
Terry Lane Nichols, Jr.
Defendant:
Wyandotte County Jail and Wyandotte County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00307
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Reece Lane, Tony Osborne and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holman v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00308
Plaintiff:
Junior Holman
Defendant:
Reece Lane, Oklahoma State of and Blaine County Jail Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Lane
as 5:2014cv00298
Plaintiff:
Robert J Anderson, III
Defendant:
Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00285
Petitioner:
Carlos Terrill Maxwell
Respondent:
Reece Lane, Oklahoma State of and Payne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
Charles David Harris
Defendant:
Reece Lane, Steve Ambrose, Bob Ernst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
