Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Weikert v. Utah Department of Corrections
as 2:2010cv00512
Petitioner:
Robert Neil Weikert
Respondent:
Utah Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Speer v. Office of the State Public Defender, The et al
as 1:2010cv00416
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Neil Speer
Defendant:
Office of the State Public Defender, The, Douglas K. Wilson, Rex Hegi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Brill et al
as 1:2009cv02491
Petitioner:
Sirrlove Williams
Respondent:
Brill, Neil, Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pope v. Carns
as 5:2008cv01306
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Neil Pope
Defendant:
Edwin Carns
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pope v. Miller, et al
as 08-6180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LLOYD NEIL POPE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID C. MILLER, Warden, FLOYD FRY, Law Library Supervisor, MEADE, Sergeant and others
Keyes v. Oyen et al
as 1:2008cv00796
Plaintiff:
Reggie Neil Keyes
Defendant:
Gerry H. Oyen, Margret McDonald and Keren Donkel
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Meek v. Jones et al
as 5:2008cv00206
Petitioner:
Colin Neil Meek
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chermack v. Banther et al
as 5:2008cv00122
Plaintiff:
Neil R Chermack, Jr
Defendant:
Dennis Banther and Kingfisher County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kolthoff v. Adler
as 5:2008cv03032
Petitioner:
John R Kolthoff
Respondent:
Neil H Adler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McGinnis v. Natrona County Detention Center Lieutenant et al
as 1:2008cv00002
Plaintiff:
Neil Adams McGinnis
Defendant:
Natrona County Detention Center Lieutenant, Jerry Clark, Natrona County Detention Center Corporal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
