Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Germonto v. Utah Legislature, The et al
as 2:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Frederick Germonto
Defendant:
Utah Legislature, The, Gary R. Herbert, Utah Board of Pardons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McConnel v. Department Of Justice et al
as 5:2012cv00127
Petitioner:
Joseph Edward McConnel
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice and United States Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marino v. Kastner et al
as 5:2011cv01465
Petitioner:
Vincent Michael Marino
Respondent:
Warden Kastner, Ellis, B Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv03191
Plaintiff:
Timothy Demitri Brown
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 10-1469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK JORDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Marino v. Kastner et al
as 5:2010cv00664
Petitioner:
Vincent Michael Marino
Respondent:
Paul A Kastner, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dedrick v. United States Department of Justice Agency
as 1:2010cv00376
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lewis Dedrick
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Patel v. United States, et al
as 09-6299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL K. PATEL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Dedrick v. United States
as 09-1490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY LEWIS DEDRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.