Cases 41 - 50 of 2,537
Payne (PS) v. Medellin et al
as 1:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Jason Payne and Jason Christopher Roberts
Defendant:
Alan Medellin and William Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross (ID 116253) v. Williams
as 5:2024cv03031
Petitioner:
Michael C. Ross
Respondent:
Thomas L. Williams and Don Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carrasco (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00611
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Carrasco
Respondent:
J.F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Czajkowski (PS) v. Bain
as 1:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Conrad J. Czajkowski
Defendant:
William Bain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aigbekaen (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Respondent:
John F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Green v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Monae Green, Marylin Monae Porter and Lamone M Johnson
Defendant:
Williams Hobbs, FNU Walls, FNU Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barrow (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00613
Petitioner:
Donnell Barrow
Respondent:
J.F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Erwin v. Zmuda, et al
as 24-3022
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADAM ERWIN
Defendant:
JEFF ZMUDA, LIBBY KEOGH, DARCIE HOLTHOUS and others
McDonald (D 113183) v. Williams et al
as 5:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Sean E. McDonald
Defendant:
Tommy Williams and Gregory Dimarzo
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bamesberger (PS) v. Sells
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Kent William Alan Bamesberger, Jr. and Kent William Alan Bamesberger
Defendant:
Sells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
