Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Manson v. Pelle et al
as 1:2017cv01198
Plaintiff:
Darryl Keith Manson
Defendant:
Joe Pelle, Boulder County Jail Deputies, Boulder County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wonsch v. Aramark Correctional Services LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00245
Plaintiff:
Robert V Wonsch
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services LLC, Joseph K Lester, F Dewayne Beggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darling v. Aramark Food Services
as 1:2016cv01328
Plaintiff:
Richard Darling
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy (ID 76894) v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 5:2016cv03027
Plaintiff:
DeRon McCoy, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services , Julie Dockendorff , Patricia Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Jefferson County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Rob Allen Patterson
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail, Correct Care Solutions and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. Jefferson County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
Alex John Jimenez
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriffs Office, Aramark Correctional Services Inc. and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Staake v. Barrela et al
as 1:2015cv00715
Plaintiff:
Mark Staake
Defendant:
FNU Barrela, Corizon, Inc., Tammy Rush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. CCS Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2015cv00677
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Carter
Defendant:
CCS Correct Care Solutions, Jones, Jenness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cross v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv02902
Plaintiff:
Elmer L. Cross, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Doris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Aramark Company et al
as 4:2014cv00607
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Deon Moore
Defendant:
Aramark Company and Tulsa County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
