Cases 51 - 60 of 273
Gruzinsky v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2015cv00387
Petitioner:
Raymond H Gruzinsky
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Cimarron Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Verdream v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv00194
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Verdream
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, FNU Duff, FNU Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longoria v. Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) et al
as 1:2015cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ysidro Longoria
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Lucero , Lucero (I) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. Pryor et al
as 1:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
Frederick A. McKenzie
Defendant:
Joe Pryor, Corrections Corporation of America, Donna Mellendeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Sutmiller et al
as 5:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
Bradley Price Barber
Defendant:
Don Sutmiller, Genese McCoy, Chad Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klein v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 15-7001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
QUINN AARON KLEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, MARTY GARRISON, TIM WILKERSON and others
Brown v. Wilkinson et al
as 5:2014cv01426
Petitioner:
Kevin Maurice Brown
Respondent:
Tim Wilkinson, Laimmer Ray, Tanner Traci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Rankins, et al
as 14-7101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY G. MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
W. RANKINS and CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Marshall v. Rankins, et al
as 14-7097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY G. MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
W. RANKINS and CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Handy, Jr. v. Tiona et al
as 1:2014cv03167
Plaintiff:
Wyatt T. Handy, Jr.
Defendant:
Tiona, Desiree Andrews, Valerie Bazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
