Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Myers v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
Clifford Gene Myers
Defendant:
Lewis Hawkins, Lt Youngblood, Sergeant Nold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2009cv03261
Petitioner:
Harold E. Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Kansas, State of, Sam Cline and Stephen Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 5:2009cv03226
Petitioner:
Harry Hawkins, Jr
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and Sheldon Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009mc00424
Hawkins, Jr. v. Lemons, et al
as 09-3294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD E. HAWKINS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL LEMONS, Police Officer, individual and as employee for the State of Kansas, FONGVILAY PHOMMACHANH, Police Officer, individually and as employee of the State of Kansas, JANE AND JOHN DOES and others
Hawkins v. Addison et al
as 5:2009cv01070
Petitioner:
Qualon Eugene Hawkins
Respondent:
Mike Addison and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Lemons et al
as 5:2009cv03116
Plaintiff:
Harold E. Hawkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Carl Lemons, Fongvilay Phommachanh, John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hahn v. Calhoun et al
as 4:2009cv00039
Plaintiff:
Vinson Hahn
Defendant:
Stacy Calhoun, Ashley Rich, Lindsey Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hawkins v. Hews et al
as 5:2009cv00008
Plaintiff:
Trenton Hawkins
Defendant:
Karen Hews and Abie Gonzales
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Slack v. Jones, et al
as 08-1449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDDY LEE SLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
JACKIE JONES, JOHN CARROLL, LISA LEHN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
