Cases 51 - 58 of 58
Soto-Montes v. Bogart et al
as 5:2008cv03108
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Soto-Montes
Defendant:
(fnu) Bogart, (fnu) Wettstrein, (fnu) McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rassel v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2007cv03290
Plaintiff:
Todd A Rassel
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, David R. McKune, Impact Design LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Feleciano et al
as 5:2007cv03274
Plaintiff:
Altus Ray Kelly
Defendant:
Paul Feleciano, Roger Werholtz, Cherryl Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frey v. Adams County Ct Svcs, et al
as 07-1326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY ALLEN FREY, AKA Jeff Lemley, AKA Jay A. Lemley, AKA Aaron Lemley, AKA Aaron Frey
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS COUNTY COURT SERVICES, JOHN DOE & JANE DOE 1-10, CAPTAIN GONZALES, COMPLETE CASE MANAGEMENT STAFF OF D.O.C.; JOHN DOE & JANE DOE 10-20, SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT and others
Chavez v. United States Sent., et al
as 07-1323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN LOPEZ CHAVEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION, [sic] Washington, D.C., KENNETH P. COHEN, United States Commission Washington, D.C., JUDGE, DISTRICT COURT OF WELD COUNTY and others
Kouris v. Gurley, et al
as 07-1293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT GEORGE KOURIS
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD THOMAS JUDGE RICHARD THOMAS GURLEY, 21st Judicial District, Mesa County, AMANDA JUDGE AMANDA BAILEY, 21st Judicial District, Mesa County, PETE DA PETE HATZINGER, District Attorney's Office, 21st Judicial District and others
Edmisten v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2007cv03116
Plaintiff:
Jonathan J Edmisten
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, David R. McKune, Ray Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Donley et al
as 5:2007cv03066
Plaintiff:
McKinley Ross
Defendant:
Cherry Donley, Jordan Baxter, J Ponds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
