Cases 71 - 80 of 133
Espinosa-Hernandez v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County et al
as 5:2018cv00606
Plaintiff:
Anastasia Gale Espinosa-Hernandez
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County , John Whetsel and Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peters v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2018cv00144
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Joe Allbaugh, Joel Mccurdy and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Allen Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wirtz v. Taylor et al
as 5:2018cv00140
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Wirtz, Jr
Defendant:
PD Taylor and Armor Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. Allbaugh et al
as 6:2017cv00466
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. Woodson
Defendant:
Joe Allbaugh, Core Civic, Inc., Mark Knuston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ealey v. Hiniger et al
as 6:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rodriguez Ealey
Defendant:
Damon T. Hiniger, Core Civic, Inc., Robert Perry, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv00293
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc., James Yates, M. Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooks v. Bethany Police Department et al
as 5:2017cv00658
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dewayne Hooks
Defendant:
Bethany Police Department, Oklahoma County Jail, Armor Correctional Health Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Sadawi v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00302
Plaintiff:
Karim Mahdi Al-Sadawi
Defendant:
Phillip Morris USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wonsch v. Smart Communications US Inc et al
as 5:2017cv00342
Plaintiff:
Robert V Wonsch
Defendant:
Smart Communications US Inc, Smart Jail Mail.com, Summit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Rios et al
as 5:2017cv00167
Plaintiff:
Chad Jeremy Adams
Defendant:
Hector Rios, Jr, GEO Group Inc, Dean Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
