Cases 81 - 90 of 421
Harry v. Hudson et al
as 5:2022cv03186
Plaintiff:
Scott Harry
Defendant:
(fnu) Hudson, Jason Clark, Kristine Aulepp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fawley v. Tafoya Lucero, et al
as 22-2091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN W. FAWLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ALISHA TAFOYA LUCERO, DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden, LCCF, HOWARD CLARKE, Director and others
Clark v Crow
as 4:2022cv00334
Defendant:
David George Clark and Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sweet v. Clark
as 4:2022cv00329
Petitioner:
Alexander Nicholaus Sweet
Respondent:
Shannon Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Tulsa County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
David George Clark
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Tulsa County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Bickle et al
as 1:2022cv01356
Plaintiff:
Swain Clarke
Defendant:
B. Bickle and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Garcia v. Anderson et al
as 1:2022cv01209
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Defendant:
James Anderson, Clark Smith, Spencer Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiefenback v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Seth Tiefenback
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Travis Trani, Ruth Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
