Cases 81 - 90 of 100
White v. Buser, et al
as 09-3322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN JAMES WHITE, FDBA James Richard White
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE G. BUSER, Acting Unit Manager, USP-Leavenworth, WILLIAM MCCOLLUM, MD, USP-Leavenworth, JOHN DRENAN, (SIC) Administrator of Health Services, USP-Leavenworth and others
Preacher, et al v. Wiley, et al
as 09-1493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUKE PREACHER
Plaintiff:
DAVID BAXTER, AKA Richie Antonio Hall and DAWANE MALLETT
Defendant - Appellee:
RON WILEY, Warden ADX-Florence, B. A. BLEDSOE, Warden USP Marion, J. FOX, Associate Warden ADX-Florence and others
Gillon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 1:2009cv02530
Plaintiff:
Ingmar Gillon
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, Blake Davis, US Penitentiary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Staples v. Chester
as 09-3267
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM STAPLES
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAUDE CHESTER, Warden - USP Leavenworth
Hernandez, Sr. v. Gallegos
as 09-3180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER HERNANDEZ, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
E. J. GALLEGOS, Former Warden, USP-Leavenworth and KENDALL HUGHES, Chaplin Director, Life Connection Program
Christy v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2009cv03044
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Christy
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP Leavenworth, C. Chester and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McCarthy v. Warden
as 09-1068
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN J. MCCARTHY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, USP Florence
McCarthy v. Warden, USP Florence
as 08-1492
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN J. MCCARTHY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, USP FLORENCE
McCarthy v. Warden
as 08-1468
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN J. MCCARTHY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, USP Florence
Rashaw-Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2008cv03287
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey L Rashaw-Bey
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP Leavenworth, C Chester and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
