Cases 81 - 90 of 49,549
Johnson (PS) v. Keller et al
as 1:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Walter Johnson
Defendant:
Keller and A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Rustin Dean Sparks
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Marshall Griffith, Ryan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa (PS) v. Sam et al
as 1:2024cv01362
Plaintiff:
John M Rosa and John Michael Rosa
Defendant:
Sam, Mckayla, Shawn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones (ID 98286) v. Langford
as 5:2024cv03065
Petitioner:
Austin Jones
Respondent:
Donald Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McShan v. USP Leavenworth
as 5:2024cv03066
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jawon McShan
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hoffman et al v. State of New Mexico Parole Board
as 1:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Zachary Hoffman, David T. Hernandez, Randy Lopez and others
Defendant:
State of New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya, GCCF Staff and New Mexico State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
George Ortiz
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya, New Mexico State Parole Board, FNU Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mays
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Waters et al
as 6:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Jester Cole McKinney
Defendant:
Kyle Waters, Stacy Slaughter and Sequoyah County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
