Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Carbajal et al v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv03062
Plaintiff:
Dean Carbajal, Warren Worthington, Estate of Robert Murphy and others
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Jeff Long, Jeff (I) Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00131
Defendant:
Matthew Willis, Sarah Kessler, City of Tulsa, Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Read-Forbes v. USA ***DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE. All filings to be made in criminal case 12-20099-khv.
as 2:2019cv02530
Petitioner:
Mendy Read-Forbes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Forbes v. Garcia, et al
as 17-1012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON FORBES
Defendant - Appellee:
GARCIA, Deputy, EID #13141, YOSHIMIYA, Deputy, EID #13080 and GONZALES, Deputy, EID #07092
Defendant:
C. JOHNSON, Deputy, EID #13095, CHOAFE, Deputy, EID #12023 and WILLIAM WEBSTER, Deputy
Forbes v. Garcia, et al
as 16-1272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON FORBES
Defendant - Appellee:
GARCIA, Deputy, EID #13141, C. JOHNSON, Deputy, EID #13095, YOSHIMIYA, Deputy, EID #13080 and others
Forbes v. Garcia et al
as 1:2015cv01860
Plaintiff:
Jason Forbes
Defendant:
Garcia, C. Johnson, Yoshimiya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forbes v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
William Henry Forbes
Defendant:
State of Wyoming , Wyoming Department of Corrections and Wyoming Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Forbes v. Milyard et al
as 1:2010cv01305
Petitioner:
Craig Dewayne Forbes
Respondent:
Kevin Milyard and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Forbes v. Laramie County Detention Center
as 2:2008cv00073
Plaintiff:
William Forbes
Defendant:
Laramie County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
